Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2017-04-26 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2017-04-26 House Journal Page 1216 HB 69 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 69 "An Act repealing the Workers' Compensation Appeals Commission; relating to decisions and orders of the Workers' Compensation Appeals Commission; relating to superior court jurisdiction over appeals from Alaska Workers' Compensation Board decisions; repealing Rules 201.1, 401.1, and 501.1, Alaska Rules of Appellate Procedure, and amending Rules 202(a), 204(a) - (c), 210(e), 601(b), and 603(a), Alaska Rules of Appellate Procedure; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page L&C RPT 5DP 1NR 241 FN1: (LWF) 241 FN2: ZERO(AJS) 241 JUD RPT CS(JUD) NT 3DP 1NR 778 FN1: (LWF) 779 FN2: ZERO(AJS) 779 CORRECTED JUD RPT CS(JUD) NT 3DP 1NR 802 FN2: ZERO(AJS) 803 FN3: (LWF) 803 FIN RPT CS(JUD) NT 6DP 3NR 1167 FN2: ZERO(AJS) 1168 FN3: (LWF) 1168 Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 69(JUD) "An Act repealing the Workers' Compensation Appeals Commission; relating to decisions and orders of the Workers' Compensation Appeals Commission; relating to superior court jurisdiction over appeals from Alaska Workers' Compensation 2017-04-26 House Journal Page 1217 Board decisions; repealing Rules 201.1, 401.1, and 501.1, Alaska Rules of Appellate Procedure, and amending Rules 202(a), 204(a) - (c), 210(e), 601(b), 602(c) and (h), and 603(a), Alaska Rules of Appellate Procedure; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 69(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 69(JUD) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 69(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 69(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 40 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Claman, Drummond, Eastman, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Neuman, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Westlake, Wilson, Wool And so, CSHB 69(JUD) passed the House. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule changes. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 69(JUD) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.